HOME
PHILOSOPHY
YOUR TRAINER
LOCATIONS
FITNESS INFO
CHOOSING A TRAINER
SUCCESS STORIES
GET STARTED




Weight Training for Weight Loss:
High Reps/ Low Weight vs. High Intensity/ High Volume


By Joshua Hutchins, CSCS

There is a generally accepted principle that you have probably heard: If you want to bulk up, lift heavier weights and do fewer repetitions (reps). If you want to slim down, do lighter weight and higher repetitions. This idea is based in fact, but is definitely not the whole story.

There is a continuum that exists in weight training: Sets1 that include a low number of reps to failure2 are going to improve strength and power. Sets that include a higher number of reps to failure will improve muscular endurance. The midpoint of this continuum is around 15 to 20 reps. Less than 15 reps per set, you should think of strength and power. Over 20, you should think of endurance. Consequently, improvements in strength and power generally come with some degree of muscle hypertrophy3. Conversely, you do not expect to see such muscle hypertrophy with endurance training.

This logic is often taken one more somewhat misguided step: light weight/ high reps = smaller and high weight/ low reps = bigger. This, however, is not necessarily always the case. There are two main factors that determine the effectiveness of your weight loss workout: Volume and Intensity.

Volume refers to the total number of reps you complete during your entire workout. In other words, if your workout consists of 20 pushups, 20 squats, and 20 pull-ups; the volume would be 60.

Intensity simply refers to how hard you are working. This is obviously subjective. One parameter of intensity is how close you are to failure at your last rep. Most sets should be done to failure (or close!). People will often take the "low weight" part of the equation to mean "easy weight". Remember as stated above, the continuum is based on sets to failure. If you are doing an exercise and your goal is to reach failure at 20 reps, you will of course use a lighter weight than if you are going for 8 reps to failure; but remember: it's still to failure! Perhaps we should use the term "less heavy weight" instead.

Both volume and intensity must be high to maximize weight loss. Keep that in mind as you look at this illustration:

Both Jill and Pat are working out with the main goal of weight loss. Let's compare their workouts:
Jill's workout
Leg Press: 50 lbs. X 20 reps
Rest 5 minutes
Modified pushups: 20 reps
Rest 5 minutes
Rows: 10 lbs. X 20 reps
Rest 5 minutes
Repeat for 30 minutes
* No exercise was close to failure
Pat's workout
Leg Press: 150 lbs. X 10 reps
Full Pushups: 10 reps
Rows: 30 lbs. X 10 reps
Repeat for 30 minutes only resting when absolutely necessary.
* All exercises were either to failure of very close


Jill is completing the supposed magical higher reps per set; however, her intensity is lacking. She is resting much too long between sets and the weight is much too light. Pat is completing a relatively low number of reps per set (just half the number of Jill) but is keeping a much higher intensity level by keeping the rest periods low and working to failure. Also, in all likelihood, despite Pat's smaller sets, she will have completed more total reps by the end of the workout giving her a higher volume than Jill. Therefore, since Pat is experiencing higher intensity and volume I would expect to see Pat experience better weight loss results.

Conclusion: I can't stress enough that high reps per set is not a magic pill for weight loss. What is? In my opinion: Volume and Intensity. If you have 30 minutes to devote to a workout, be as intense as possible for those 30 minutes. Work hard. I promise that you will see better results than if you stick to the old mantra: High reps/ light weight = weight loss.

1 Any given number of repetitions completed back to back without rest.
2 The point at which your body cannot physically complete another repetition without rest.
3 An increase in the actual size of the muscle.



<<Back

"Information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only, and is not to be construed as medical advice in any manner. Please consult your doctor or another licensed physician prior to beginning any course of exercise."
© 2007 by Joshua Hutchins and Core Results, Inc.
After I added daily golf lessons and hockey twice a week, we decided to back me down to 2 to get better results and to also not wear me out. How many trainers would suggest that?
- Scott
Construction Supplier



Josh took so many personal things into consideration when designing my routine -- he worked around my knee problems, catered to my limited schedule, and incorporated all the things I love to do (like use a boxing bag and balance board). As a result, I have a customized routine that is easy to fit into any day!
- Jennifer
New mom



Crystal is teaching me about how nutrition and exercise affect my metabolism. Even though my journey from obesity has just started, I know now that I am on the right path with the perfect guide.
- Max B.
Director of Development



Tara is an excellent trainer. I like the 100% attention she directs to my form and movement during an exercise. The training sessions are never the same. Though different than I have ever done before, I’ve watched my strength build over time. She pushes you with the right balance and cares about your overall health. She is very professional, always on time, and I would recommend her to high touch clients. Overall, Tara was excellent and I wish her well in her endeavors. I think she will go far with the discipline I've observed, her academia background, and passion for her work.
- Jacqueline
Customized Software and Hardware Solutions Manager




PERSONAL TRAINING FOR THE RALEIGH - CARY - TRIANGLE AREA


home | philosophy | your trainer | locations | fitness info | choosing a trainer | success stories | get started
©Copyright 2005-2008 Core Results, all rights reserved.